Friday, December 28, 2012

Is Google Using AdWords Express Budgets To Promote Google+?

Google now offers small businesses using its AdWords Express service a way to promote their Google+ pages seemingly everywhere but on Google+ itself, which Google reasserts should be an ad-free zone. That?omission may make these ads less effective for those seeking new customers or followers to their Google+ pages. Meanwhile, the push gets those same small businesses spending their advertising dollars to promote Google+ itself for Google.

AdWords Express & Google+ Pages

In case you?re not?familiar?with AdWords Express, it?s Google?s version of automated paid search. With AdWords Express, small and local businesses who are in a time crunch and don?t have time to properly set up campaigns let Google run their ads. Google then chooses where to show the ads. Some will appear in Google search results, based on terms that Google selects. Some appear within Google Maps. Some appear on non-Google sites that are part of the Google advertising network.

Since some small businesses don?t have web sites, Google has offered them free ones to use with AdWords Express through its Get Your Business Online service. But now, Google has said businesses can drive visitors to their Google+ pages.

In a?post?late last week Christian Oestlien, a member of?Google Product Management, announced that AdWords Express would now ?offer? businesses a new way to promote their Google+ pages:

Along with the announcement Oestlien mentioned that this option would be available for all Google properties ? except, well, Google+. In fact, Oestlien took a pseudo-swing at Facebook by stating:

? we only show these promotions when they?re appropriate?not overwhelming people with random ads when they?re trying to spend time with friends.

Why No Advertising On Google+?

Many could argue that if you are trying ?attract more followers? they would want to do so on Google+ itself. Why show social network ads in search? Why show them for your Google+ page in maps? This is a hard stance that Google+ took throughout 2012. But the thing is, social ads work. There simply isn?t a better place for admins to try and grow fans with ads than from targeted ads in the social network.

Well, Can You Advertise To Just Google+ Users?

The answer is no. A Google representative?confirmed to us that the only targeting option is ?normal targeting,? so it will reach everyone. This is a huge negative for those AdWords Express advertisers who are trying to build a following for their Google+ page. Seeing that you can?t advertise on the social network and you can?t target those across the Google network with a Google+ enabled account, you have no guarantee that a click is coming from someone who has a Google+ account or if they have even heard of Google+ before.

So Just What Is This New Service That Google Is ?Offering??

The 10,000-foot view of this announcement reads like this:

  • You give your money to Google to handle online advertising
  • Google spends your money across their network
  • Instead of driving traffic to your site, the new?announcement??offers? businesses the ability to let Google drive traffic to a Google property
  • The goal is to ?attract new followers and customers? but Google can?t show ads within the social network itself.
  • Nor can active Google+ users be targeted

Why Is This A Bit Suspect?

While Google+ has been relatively successful, it has come at the hands of a huge investment. From advertising during big NFL games, to worldwide print and TV campaigns, to big NFL partnerships, Google has spent?inordinate marketing resources on the Google+ product. In a way, Google is now leveraging AdWords Express users? budgets to do so, too.

The glaring lack of ability to target ads on Google+ itself, or even to target users who are on Google+ makes for un-targeted, poor advertising for those looking to build their pages. The majority of those users who click will have to be sold on Google+ first before they can follow a brand page. Instead of hitting active users, advertisers are simply handing money to Google to blast the budget across the general Google network.

None of the other social networks operate in this fashion. Facebook offers a variety of advertising options across the social network, Twitter has a handful of ad options across Twitter. The key is that all of these are on the network that has that social scent trail to it.

So Is This New Service Helpful For Anyone?

Is this worth doing? In some cases, absolutely. If a company doesn?t have resources for a website and they don?t want to promote their Facebook page, this gives them an option to get up and running. If you are on a shoestring budget and need a landing page, this option may?quench?your?thirst?for more eyeballs. The issue isn?t with the ?attract new customers? statement that Oestlien made, but more about the attraction of new followers aspect as there is no Google+ user targeting built into the service.

While this new targeting may look valuable at-a-glance, severe lack of targeting makes it tough to recommend to anyone. From Google?s standpoint however, this would be an ideal selection for advertisers as a big byproduct of the budget is more awareness of the Google+ product.

Related Topics: Google | Google: Google+ | Top News



SMX - Search Marketing Expo

Source: http://marketingland.com/is-google-using-adwords-express-budgets-to-promote-google-29583

josh smith birdsong teresa giudice atlanta hawks flyers 2012 white house correspondents dinner forrest gump

TSA seizes record number of guns at airports in 2012

7 hrs.

Travelers have attempted to carry more than 1,500 firearms through U.S. airports and?on?board airplanes in 2012, according to the Transportation Security Administration.?

As of Friday, TSA's gun?tally sat at 1,527?? 1,295 of which were loaded ? and this week?s count will likely bring the final tally just past 1,550 before the year ends.

Once a weapon is found, the TSA?s job ends, David Castelveter, the agency?s director of external communications, told Skift.??We are not an arresting authority. We don?t have detention authority. If somebody comes through with a weapon the immediate procedure is to call the local authority,? he said. ?There are some states where they just tell you to take it back to the car; in others you?ll end up at Rikers.?

Beyond the weekly tallies, which the TSA posts every Friday afternoon on its blog,?TSA does not follow arrests, indictments?or convictions stemming from firearms violations.??We just keep track of the confiscations, because the police don?t always keep us apprised of what happens,? Castelveter said.??We don?t pay attention to the arrest unless it turns into an indictment and we have an agent give testimony in a trial.?

The second half of 2012 has seen an increase over gun activity in the first six months: In July?On the National Security Beat, a project of Medill Journalism School, reported that 697 guns had been found, 170 of which were not only loaded but had rounds in their chambers.

Skift reported?earlier this month?that of the top 11 airports for firearms confiscation, five were in Texas, two were in Florida, and the most-confiscated title went to Atlanta?s?Hartsfield ? Jackson International.

More?stories?from Skift

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/travel/tsa-confiscates-record-number-guns-us-airports-2012-1C7753890

tebow press conference trina rob dyrdek oberon donald driver donald driver robin thicke

European shares steady as "fiscal cliff" push awaited

LONDON (Reuters) - European shares were steady and the euro edged higher on Thursday, as U.S. lawmakers prepared to resume negotiations to avoid a fiscal crunch, while the yen hit a 21-month low on the prospect of drastic monetary easing.

Returning from the Christmas holiday break, European shares opened little changed at 1137 points, with London's FTSE 100, Paris's CAC-40 and Frankfurt's DAX between 0.1 percent lower and 0.4 percent higher.

A 0.1 percent gain in U.S. stock futures suggested a firm Wall Street start.

In a sign that there may be a way to break the deadlock in the U.S. Congress, Republican House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner urged the Democrat-controlled Senate to act to pull back from the cliff and offered to at least consider any bill the upper chamber produced.

President Barack Obama will try to revive budget crisis talks which stalled last week when he returns to Washington on Thursday after cutting short his Christmas holiday in Hawaii.

"There is still hope for a last-minute deal, otherwise we're in for a correction in January. People have already priced in an agreement. Without it, the market can't stay at these levels," a Paris-based trader said.

Economists warn that the "fiscal cliff" of higher taxes and spending cuts worth $600 billion could push the world's largest economy into recession, dragging other countries with it.

Such concerns underpinned the dollar as the fiscal impasse continues to sap investor appetite for risky assets, raising the dollar's safe-haven appeal.

Against the yen, the dollar at 85.87 yen reached its highest since September 2010, with investors accelerating their yen sales after new Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said his government would pursue a bold monetary policy, a flexible fiscal policy and a growth strategy to encourage private investment.

The euro, which is being supported by a better outlook towards the euro zone, climbed 0.4 percent to $1.3266.

In commodity markets, London copper rose 1.7 percent to a one-week high of $7,932 a tonne after some positive data from China, the world's top copper buyer.

U.S. crude futures inched up 0.2 percent to $91.14 a barrel, helped by the Chinese data and also by hopes the new Japanese government's policies would spur demand. Brent crude steadied at $111.03.

With bond investors focusing on Washington, German government bond futures opened little changed at 144.72.

(Reporting by Marc Jones; Editing by Giles Elgood)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/european-shares-steady-fiscal-cliff-push-awaited-090108396--finance.html

the weather channel tony romo national grid LIPA MBTA Cnn Live Garcinia Cambogia

Thursday, December 27, 2012

rubeldebnath2: victorrusso23: Shopping And Product Reviews: Toys ...

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Source: http://matkopliza9.typepad.com/blog/2012/12/shopping-and-product-reviews-toys-article-category-by-elleeatist.html

affordable care act the line us soccer bobby brown arrested the happening black panthers mauritania

Source: http://victorrusso23.blogspot.com/2012/12/shopping-and-product-reviews-toys.html

brooke mueller all star weekend lent undercover boss barbara walters tupelo honey limp bizkit

Source: http://rubeldebnath2.blogspot.com/2012/12/victorrusso23-shopping-and-product.html

Mens Gymnastics Allison Schmitt Olympic Schedule Kyla Ross Ryan Lochte Montenegro Olympic Games

Source: http://omicron-antipodal.blogspot.com/2012/12/rubeldebnath2-victorrusso23-shopping.html

Colorado Marijuana Washington Election Results drudge report Presidential Election 2012 Incumbent politico Tammy Baldwin

Source: http://opidagva.posterous.com/rubeldebnath2-victorrusso23-shopping-and-prod

cleveland news daytona race the cutting edge fox 8 news indy 500 angelina jolie leg daytona

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Mobile Marketing | Big Data Advantages

This type of marketing allows marketers and advertisers to promote products and services over mobile devices including cellular phones, smartphones, portable media players and tablets.

According to marketing professor Andreas Kaplan, mobile marketing is, ?Any marketing activity conducted through a ubiquitous network to which consumers are constantly connected using a personal mobile device?. Because mobile marketing is conducted using wireless networks, it is also known as ?wireless marketing?. Marketing communications on mobile devices is generally carried out via text messages or applications. Since consumers typically carry their mobile devices with them throughout the day, mobile marketing presents a cost-effective way for brands to deliver targeted messaging across different platforms. (Figure 1)

Types of Mobile Marketing

One of the most popular forms of mobile advertising is?text messaging. During the early 2000s, marketing through cell phones? Short Message Service (SMS) became increasingly common in Europe and parts of Asia. Consequently, SMS marketing has become a legitimate advertising channel in both developed and developing economies around the world. On average, it is estimated that SMS messages are read within four minutes after delivery to a mobile device. This makes mobile marketing highly attractive to brands looking for marketing communication channels with high lead-to-conversion rates.

Unlike SMS,?Multimedia Message Service?(MMS) mobile marketing combines the delivery of images, text, audio and video. Nearly all new phones with a color screen are capable of sending and receiving standard MMS messages. Brands are able to both send and receive rich content through MMS A2P (application-to-person) mobile networks to mobile subscribers. In some networks, brands are also able to sponsor messages sent P2P (person-to-person).

Push notifications?have become popular due to their use on smartphones using iOS and Android operating systems. These notifications appear at the top of the device?s screen and serve as efficient mechanisms for communicating directly with end-users. Although it can potentially be viewed as interruptive by the end user, its long-term costs are lower than SMS marketing.

Game mobile marketing?provides additional opportunities for brands looking to deliver promotional messaging within mobile games. Some companies sponsor entire games to drive consumer engagement, a practice known as?mobile advergaming?or?ad-funded mobile gaming.

Mobile content advertising schemes?provided by the likes of Yahoo! and Google allow brands to purchase keywords specifically for mobile advertisements. Additionally, web forms on web pages can be used to integrate with mobile texting sources for reminders about meetings, seminars and other important events for users who are away from their laptop or desktop computers.

Quick response?(QR) codes have also gained in popularity after first being introduced in European and Asian mobile markets. Acting as a visual hyper-link to a page, QR codes enable users to jump to a mobile optimized offer page. QR codes only began to be used in mobile advertising in North America from 2011. Companies recognized the technology as a very powerful tool for initiating consumer engagement at a time when the marketing message is likely triggering its most emotional response ? the impulse moment ? for the end user.

In addition to QR codes, other tools used by mobile marketers to improve targeted messaging and reduce marketing costs include location-based services, Bluetooth technology, and proximity systems such as Short Message Service ? Cell Broadcast (SMS-CB).

Advantages and Disadvantages of Mobile Marketing

Some of the key advantages of mobile marketing are the close proximity of owners? mobile devices, as well as the habitual nature of using cell phones, smartphones and computer tablets. Distributing promotional and advertising messages customized according to the recipient?s location, geography and personal interests through wireless networks makes mobile marketing highly cost-effective given the potential reach and scope of the audience.

However, mobile marketing practices present challenges around privacy concerns over user data. Push marketing tactics ? mobile advertising that is sent without consumers? required permission ? have caused privacy violations. Although mobile advertising has become increasingly popular with the growing use of tablets and smartphones, numerous concerns have emerged due to the personal nature and close proximity of mobile devices to users. Some of the major concerns around privacy include mobile spam, personal identification, location information and wireless security.

Industry bodies including the Interactive Advertising Bureau and Mobile Marketing Association have established guidelines to prevent SPAM messages and the practice of carriers selling member databases to third parties.

However, these self-regulatory rules are also in place to support marketers looking to incorporate mobile marketing into their larger marketing communications strategies.

Source: http://stress-management-products.com/?p=1076

brandon marshall ryder cup Kate Middleton Bottomless the Pirate Bay Hotel Transylvania looper eagles

No Ben Affleck? That's OK, Massachusetts Senate race still poised to be big.

If John Kerry's seat needs to be filled next year, it will be the fourth time Massachusetts voters have chosen Senate candidates in a six-year period. Actor-director Ben Affleck said Monday he won't run.

By Mark Trumbull,?Staff writer / December 26, 2012

Sen. John Kerry D-Mass., speaks with actor Ben Affleck during a meeting with foreign relations members to discus the crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday.

Jose Luis Magana/AP

Enlarge

Massachusetts seems to have a thing about Senate races. The state is holding elections more often than usual for US Senate seats, and in ways that garner the national spotlight.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

First, remember what's typical under the US Constitution: Each state has two Senate seats, with each coming up for election every six years, on a staggered schedule.

Then, think about this string of events: Massachusetts residents appear poised to cast ballots for the US Senate four times in a six-year period, or twice the typical pace. John Kerry (D) won a reelection vote in 2008. Then, after the passing of Sen. Edward Kennedy (D), the state held a special election in early 2010 that drew national attention with Scott Brown's surprise Republican victory.

Then came the epic battle, just concluded last month, in which Elizabeth Warren took that seat back for Democrats. Now, a few weeks later, with President Obama nominating Senator Kerry to be his next secretary of State, the stage is set for another high-profile special election in the new year.

Mr. Brown, a winner in 2010 and a loser in 2012, may be back as a Republican candidate in 2013.

He won't be running against Ben Affleck. The actor-director on Monday took his name off the list of possible Democratic contenders.

But whoever ends up running, assuming that Kerry is confirmed as secretary of State, the race is sure to be a magnet for media attention and money. It would be one of the few opportunities in 2013 for voters to have a say about who sits in Congress at a time of hot fiscal debates and narrow division of power between parties.

Back in 2010, Brown's upset win foreshadowed the conservative gains later that year that would tip the House of Representatives back into Republican control. This time around, the race could become, in part, an early verdict on the performance of both parties on things like tax rates, budget deficits, and how to keep programs like Medicare and Social Security financially healthy.

Whoever wins would have to turn around and start campaigning all over again pretty quickly, since the seat is up for a scheduled vote in 2014.

How did Massachusetts get into this flurry of Senate activity?

Yes, the answer involves the death of one senator and the appointment of another to a presidential cabinet post. But it's also about decisions made in the State House in Boston about how to handle such vacancies.

Some 36 states let the governor wield the power of appointment to fill a Senate vacancy ? even if the unexpired term has years to run.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/0920a7zmmV8/No-Ben-Affleck-That-s-OK-Massachusetts-Senate-race-still-poised-to-be-big

leon panetta luck sag awards 2012 nominees

10 Things to Know for Tuesday

Volunteer Katherine Beaupre takes phone calls from children asking where Santa is and when he will deliver presents to their house, during the annual NORAD Tracks Santa Operation, at the North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, at Peterson Air Force Base, in Colorado Springs, Colo., Monday Dec. 24, 2012. Over a thousand volunteers at NORAD handle more than 100,000 thousand phone calls from children around the world every Christmas Eve, with NORAD continually projecting Santa's supposed progress delivering presents. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley)

Volunteer Katherine Beaupre takes phone calls from children asking where Santa is and when he will deliver presents to their house, during the annual NORAD Tracks Santa Operation, at the North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, at Peterson Air Force Base, in Colorado Springs, Colo., Monday Dec. 24, 2012. Over a thousand volunteers at NORAD handle more than 100,000 thousand phone calls from children around the world every Christmas Eve, with NORAD continually projecting Santa's supposed progress delivering presents. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley)

Pope Benedict XVI holds the pastoral staff as he celebrates the Christmas Eve Mass in St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican, Monday, Dec. 24, 2012. Pope Benedict XVI marked Christmas Eve with Mass in St. Peter's Basilica and a pressing question: Will people find room in their hectic, technology-driven lives for children, the poor and God? The pontiff also prayed that Israelis and Palestinians live in peace and freedom, and asked the faithful to pray for strife-torn Syria as well as Lebanon and Iraq. (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia)

A makeshift memorial that says "W.W.F.D. God Bless You" sits in front of a home in Webster, N.Y., Monday, Dec. 24, 2012. An ex-con set a car and a house ablaze in his lakeside neighborhood to lure firefighters, then opened fire on them, killing two, engaging in a shootout with police and committing suicide while several homes burned. Authorities used an armored vehicle to evacuate the area. (AP Photo/Messenger Post Media, Jack Haley)

Your daily look at late-breaking news, upcoming events and stories that will be talked about Tuesday:

1. WHO'S KEEPING TABS ON SANTA

Hundreds of volunteers at "NORAD Tracks Santa" receive tens of thousands of calls from kids curious about St. Nick's progress on Christmas Eve.

2. POPE: MAKE ROOM FOR CHRIST

Benedict XVI marks Christmas Eve with Mass in St. Peter's Basilica, asking: Will people find room in their hectic, technology-driven lives for children, the poor and God?

3. 'IT DOES APPEAR IT WAS A TRAP'

An ex-con guns down two firefighters after luring them to his central New York neighborhood by setting a car and a house ablaze.

4. CHILD DEATHS BY GUNS

Between 2006 and 2010, 561 children age 12 and under were killed by firearms, according to the FBI.

5. AFGHAN POLICEWOMAN KILLS US ADVISER

It is the first such shooting by a woman in a spate of insider attacks by Afghans against their foreign allies.

6. WHAT OBAMA FACES WHEN HE RETURNS FROM HAWAII

Big issues awaiting the president include more 'fiscal cliff' wrangling, immigration and gun control.

7. 'THE ODD COUPLE'S' BELOVED OSCAR DIES AT 90

Jack Klugman played the gruff, down-to-earth type of guy you could imagine running into at a bar or riding on a subway.

8. FOOD PANTRIES 101

Growing numbers of food banks on university campuses may be a response to a weak economy and a sign of the latest trend in student activism.

9. HOW GUN RIGHTS ADVOCATES FEEL ABOUT TV HOST

Thousands sign a petition seeking British CNN host Piers Morgan's deportation from the U.S. over his gun control views.

10. WHERE HOPES FOR A TRUCE SEEM DOUBTFUL

After talks with President Assad, the international envoy to Syria offers no indication of progress toward ending the civil war.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-12-24-10%20Things%20to%20Know-Tuesday/id-7ce6768a9ef34878a1e477ab7ea2698f

leprechaun night at the museum pope shenouda bolton muamba sxsw crystal cathedral st. patrick s day

Monday, December 24, 2012

How does a traffic cop ticket a driverless car?

Rapid progress means self-driving cars are in the fast lane to consumer reality. Is the law up to speed too, asks legal expert Bryant Walker Smith

EVER since the 1930s, self-driving cars have been just 20 years away. Many of those earlier visions, however, depended on changes to physical infrastructure that never came about - like special roads embedded with magnets.

Fast forward to today, and many of the modern concepts for such vehicles are intended to work with existing technologies. These supercomputers-on-wheels use a variety of onboard sensors - and, in some cases, stored maps or communications from other vehicles - to assist or even replace human drivers under specific conditions. And they have the potential to adapt to changes in existing infrastructure rather than requiring it to alter for them.

Infrastructure, however, is more than just roads, pavements, signs and signals. In a broad sense, it also includes the laws that govern motor vehicles: driver licensing requirements, rules of the road and principles of product liability, to name but a few. One major question remains though. Will tomorrow's cars and trucks have to adapt to today's legal infrastructure, or will that infrastructure adapt to them?

Consider the most basic question: are self-driving vehicles legal today? For the US, the short answer is that they probably can be (the long answer runs to nearly 100 pages). Granted, such vehicles must have drivers, and drivers must be able to control their vehicles - these are international requirements that date back to 1926, when horses and cattle were far more likely to be "driverless" than cars. Regardless, these rules, and many others that assume a human presence, do not necessarily prohibit vehicles from steering, braking and accelerating by themselves. Indeed, three US states - Nevada, Florida and most recently California - have passed laws to make that conclusion explicit, at least to a point.

Still unclear, even with these early adopters, is the precise responsibility of the human user, assuming one exists. Must the "driver" remain vigilant, their hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road? If not, what are they allowed to do inside, or outside, the vehicle? Under Nevada law, the person who tells a self-driving vehicle to drive becomes its driver. Unlike the driver of an ordinary vehicle, that person may send text messages. However, they may not "drive" drunk - even if sitting in a bar while the car is self-parking. Broadening the practical and economic appeal of self-driving vehicles may require releasing their human users from many of the current legal duties of driving.

For now, however, the appropriate role of a self-driving vehicle's human operator is not merely a legal question; it is also a technical one. At least at normal speeds, early generations of such vehicles are likely to be joint human-computer systems; the computer may be able to direct the vehicle on certain kinds of roads in certain kinds of traffic and weather, but its human partner may need to be ready to take over in some situations, such as unexpected road works.

A great deal of research will be done on how these transitions should be managed. Consider, for example, how much time you would need to stop reading this article, look up at the road, figure out where you are and resume steering and braking. And consider how far your car would travel in that time. (Note: do not attempt this while driving your own car.)

Technical questions like this mean it will be a while before your children are delivered to school by taxis automatically dispatched and driven by computers, or your latest online purchases arrive in a driver-less delivery truck. That also means we have time to figure out some of the truly futuristic legal questions: How do you ticket a robot? Who should pay? And can it play (or drive) by different rules of the road?

Data protection is a more pressing issue. Many cars and trucks available today already collect driving data through onboard sensors, computers and cellular devices. But imagine taking a dozen smartphones, turning on all of their sensors and cameras, linking them to your social media accounts, and affixing them to the inside and outside of your vehicle. That is an understatement of a self-driving vehicle's potential data collection. Because consumer versions of such vehicles do not yet exist, we don't know what data will actually be collected or how it will be transmitted and used. However, legal issues related to disclosure, consent and ownership will mix with important policy questions about the costs and benefits of data sharing. Indeed, some research vehicles in Germany already have privacy notices printed on their sides to warn other road users.

Finally, what happens when things go wrong - or at least not as right as they might? Given that the vast majority of crashes are caused at least in part by human error, self-driving vehicles have huge potential to save lives. But they will not be perfect; after all, humans will remain in the design loop even after they are out of the driving loop. To what standard, then, should these vehicles be held? Must they perform as well as a perfect human driver for any conceivable manoeuvre? Or must they perform merely as well as an average human in a statistical sense? In any case, how should that performance be measured?

These questions will be considered explicitly or implicitly by the regulators who create new standards, the judges and juries that decide who should pay for injuries, and how much, and the consumers who decide what kind of car to buy. The uncertainty that surrounds the answers will affect the speed and price at which these new technologies are introduced.

Why do these questions matter so much? Because ultimately their most meaningful answers will, one hopes, be expressed in terms of lives saved.

Bryant Walker Smith is a fellow at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School and the Center for Automotive Research at Stanford University, California. His analysis of the legality of self-driving vehicles in the US came out in November (bit.ly/SVCe32)

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.

Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article

Subscribe now to comment.

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/26e51f44/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Carticle0Cmg216289660B40A0A0Ehow0Edoes0Ea0Etraffic0Ecop0Eticket0Ea0Edriverless0Ecar0Bhtml0Dcmpid0FRSS0QNSNS0Q20A120EGLOBAL0Qonline0Enews/story01.htm

narwhal st louis university mario manningham mario manningham williams syndrome hoya casa de mi padre

Bengals clinch playoff spot, edge Steelers 13-10

Pittsburgh Steelers defensive end Brett Keisel (99) celebrates after making a tackle against the Cincinnati Bengals in the first quarterof an NFL football game in Pittsburgh, Sunday, Dec. 23, 2012. Keisel was penalized for the celebration on the play. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

Pittsburgh Steelers defensive end Brett Keisel (99) celebrates after making a tackle against the Cincinnati Bengals in the first quarterof an NFL football game in Pittsburgh, Sunday, Dec. 23, 2012. Keisel was penalized for the celebration on the play. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (7) is sacked by Cincinnati Bengals defensive tackle Geno Atkins in the first quarter of their NFL football game on Sunday, Dec. 23, 2012, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Cincinnati Bengals cornerback Leon Hall, left, trots into the end zone after intercepting a pass from Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger in the first quarter of an NFL football game in Pittsburgh, Sunday, Dec 23, 2012. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver A.J. Green (18) is hit by Pittsburgh Steelers strong safety Troy Polamalu (43) as he tries to catch a pass in the second quarter of an NFL football game in Pittsburgh, Sunday, Dec 23, 2012. The pass was incomplete. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

PITTSBURGH (AP) ? A.J. Green doesn't really care about the Cincinnati Bengals' woeful past. The wide receiver wasn't part of it and hasn't really taken the time to study it.

The Bengals were bad. End of story.

And now they're good. Beginning of story.

Andy Dalton hit Green for a 21-yard pass in the final minutes to set up Josh Brown's 43-yard field goal with 4 seconds left to lift the Bengals to a 13-10 win over the Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday. Cincinnati (9-6) clinched a second straight playoff berth after beating the Steelers (7-8) for the first time since 2009. Pittsburgh (7-8) was eliminated from postseason contention.

The only other time the Bengals made the playoffs in consecutive seasons came in 1981-82, six years before Green was born.

"This has been our goal coming in at the beginning of the season," Green said. "A lot of people talked about we hadn't been in in back to back seasons in 30 years. I don't worry about that stuff. I've been here two years and we made the playoffs all two years. That's all we can control."

Shredding the label as erratic ? and sometimes comical ? losers one improbable victory at a time, the Bengals, their precocious duo of Green and Dalton and their quickly improving defense have Cincinnati in uncharted territory.

The Bengals have been around since 1968. This is the first time they'll make the postseason in two straight non-strike years.

"I know they just think that there's some complex; there's no complex, you've just got to come play and win," coach Marvin Lewis said. "This group in there has very little history of anything."

Maybe that's why Bengals aren't doomed to repeat it.

Brown missed a 56-yarder earlier in the fourth quarter, but earned a second chance when Reggie Nelson picked off Ben Roethlisberger and returned it to the Pittsburgh 46 with 14 seconds remaining. Dalton found Green down the right sideline on the next play, setting up Brown's winner.

"I've had some pretty big kicks, but that was a long time ago," said Brown, who is filling in for injured starter Mike Nugent. "When you have a chance for the playoffs there's nothing bigger. It's a big deal.

Dalton completed 24 of 41 for 278 yards and two interceptions for the Bengals, which snapped a five-game losing streak to Pittsburgh. Green caught 10 passes for 116 yards and Cincinnati's defense next let the Steelers get comfortable.

Roethlisberger completed 14 of 28 passes for 220 yards with a touchdown and two interceptions. Leon Hall returned the first pick 17 yards for a touchdown in the first quarter and Nelson stepped in front of an overthrown Roethlisberger pass in the fourth.

The Steelers needed to win their final two games to make the playoffs. Instead, the team that was 6-3 in early November will spend January at home after falling for the fifth time in its last six games.

"''We should be (in the playoffs) if it wasn't for me," Roethlisberger said after throwing his second game-deciding interception in eight days.

Roethlisberger tossed a pick ? also intended for Wallace ? on the second play of overtime in Dallas last Sunday, allowing the Cowboys to win it on a field goal. He openly questioned offensive coordinator Todd Haley's play calling after the loss, but apologized later and insisted he and Haley were "on the same page."

Maybe, but the Steelers hardly played like it. The Bengals sacked Roethlisberger four times and allowed Pittsburgh to complete just 2 of 14 third downs.

"Not our day and thus, not our year," Pittsburgh coach Mike Tomlin said. "Just not enough significant plays at the moments. Sounds like a broken record but reality as we sit here."

Pittsburgh did a decent job of keeping Dalton and Green in check, posting season highs with three turnovers and six sacks. The Bengals couldn't run the ball at all, managing just 14 yards against the NFL's top defense. Still, it wasn't enough for the Steelers, turning a season that looked so promising before Election Day into a muddled mess.

Instead of making playoff plans, Pittsburgh needs a victory next week against Cleveland to avoid the first losing season in Tomlin's six-year tenure.

Normally it's the Bengals who are playing out the string. Yet the franchise that served as a punchline for so long is now the one throwing the punches. Cincinnati never trailed in a place it rarely wins and allowed the Steelers to make the critical mistakes.

Well, most of them anyway.

Cincinnati drove into Pittsburgh territory midway through the fourth quarter with the score tied at 10 before things bogged down at the Steelers 38. Rather than try to pin reeling Pittsburgh deep, Lewis sent out Brown to attempt a 56-yard field goal into the tricky Heinz Field winds.

The kick was never close, giving the Steelers premium field position with 3:18 left.

"I make decisions to try to win the game today and they kind of backfired on me a little bit," Lewis said.

Pittsburgh, however, had its own kicking issues. The Steelers moved to the Cincinnati 36, then brought out Shaun Suisham for a 53-yard attempt that was short all the way.

The Bengals went nowhere, giving Pittsburgh one last shot in regulation. Rather than run out the clock and play for overtime with the ball at their own 11 and 44 seconds to go, the Steelers tried to make something happen.

And they did. For the Bengals. Facing second down at the Pittsburgh 29, Roethlisberger rolled to his right and tried to hit Wallace down the sideline. The ball sailed over Wallace's head and into Nelson's arms.

Two plays later Cincinnati was celebrating a playoff berth that signaled another step out of its mediocre past.

NOTES: Cincinnati's 14 yards rushing were the second-fewest in franchise history. The Bengals had 4 yards rushing against Baltimore in 2000 ... Pittsburgh TE Heath Miller left game in the fourth quarter with a right knee injury ... Brown is 8 of 9 since taking over for Nugent three weeks ago ... Five of Pittsburgh's eight losses this season have come by three points ... Steelers RB Rashard Mendenhall had 50 yards rushing in his return after serving a one-game suspension for conduct detrimental to the team.

___

Online: http://pro32.ap.org/poll and http://twitter.com/AP_NFL

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2012-12-23-Bengals-Steelers/id-1d1af4d860f44dc8af89b0ccfce9aa0d

ghost ship tiger woods masters jet crash virginia beach petrino clayton kershaw tyler perry face transplant

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Quotations of the day

Please check the URL for proper spelling and capitalization. If you're having trouble locating a destination on Yahoo!, try visiting the Yahoo! homepage or look through a list of Yahoo!'s online services.

Please try Yahoo Help Central if you need more assistance.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/quotations-day-070627283.html

joan crawford john goodman kendall marshall whitney houston news sylvia plath whitney houston whitney houston autopsy results

Theoretical frameworks on supplier relationship management in ...

Abstract? The evolution of modern communication methods, especially the transfer of data and information via the Internet, allowing companies to relocate relationships with business partners worldwide. New trends in the field of management, especially in the economic instability that shakes the world, have generated an increase in the significance of the concept of supplier relationship management (SRM). Enterprises that grants importance to this new concept become more flexible in dealings. By exchange of information they can streamline business processes more effectively and may have better access to resources boom. In this context, the success of an organization is due not only to their own efforts, but undoubtedly the result of collaboration with partners.
Keywords- supply relationship management, commitment, influence, behavior, collaboration, partnership.
I. INTRODUCTION
The deepening global economic disparities at regional or country level produces dramatic effects in the approach of business relationships. Constant changes in the market involve companies in a global competition [1]. Thus, in response to the upheavals of the new economic environment, companies can use competitive behavior and readjustment strategies to widening communications with business partners [2]. These challenges are forcing economic operators to accept and implement new technologies, to adopt modified forms of organization and management, to connect and to join electronic networks for transferring information for not coming in isolation, and, last but not least, to look in a different way the contribution of individual to the development of the company and its corporate strategies. Therefore, in terms of access to increasingly limited resources the option for integration and strengthening relations in the supply chain enables a better understanding of the needs and desires of partners [3]. Moreover, creating and maintaining a good supplier relationships emerges as a breath of new managerial philosophy based on several key features: growth and development, respect, partnership, proper risk management, developing new capabilities. But all this requires costs. Which weigh in company option to choose and maintain certain providers is undoubtedly the benefit consistency made on short or long term. Thus, by permanent concern they have, respective coordinate activities in order to obtain a benefit, companies focus more on suppliers than customers. Close collaboration with a valuable set of suppliers is always more productive than termination with them [5]. With such perspective customers and suppliers are not intended primarily to maximize short-term trading results, but looking for an advantage generated by long-term ties. Thus, through the relationship with suppliers, business management is put into a new light, and companies that are willing to embrace this philosophy will acquire in time adequate results. It is necessary to seek along with the partners the most effective ways of maintaining risk management business credibility and commitment initiated.
II. SRM. MEANINGS AND DETERMINATION.
A number of authors, Donoghue [4], IDC [13] argue existence of three essential elements in SRM: collaboration, integration and trust.
A. Colaboration

One way is to take the collaboration partner enterprises of the principle just the right time (JIT) ?Fig. 1?.

Larson [14] Guerra and Cianchette [15] consider that such cooperation does not require for networking organizations just an art of maintaining a balance between supply and demand, or only a mathematical rigor in the production process, or perfect synchronization of supply in customer-supplier equation, but also the mutual benefit provided by implementing common applications that enable continuous exchange of information and better control over the management of long-term contracts. More flexible organizational processes in terms of SRM by such agreements also involve discussion between the partners for the availability of affordable solutions. It is envisaged first the customer savings, and secondly guarantees for suppliers that goods will not remain in stock.
As for cooperation in the information exchange, Wienclaw [16], Wis. & Morrison [17] explain historical development of relations with suppliers, especially by making B2B software, by computer networks, the purchase and installation software , ideas, supported by Sethi [2] by showing businesses real time access in to information shared as a result of overcoming many of the technical barriers of the past thanks to the IT boom of 21st century.
B. Integration
By integrating, SRM intends to deepen the ties of dependency and mutual influence between the parties, creating the synergy processes in the value chain. Synthesizing the best practices of SRM, Barry, Senthil and Pradip [18] agree that the key business players, using a common e-platform of trade and marketing (e-marketplaces) they enlarge their e-business concerns, synchronizing the processes by connecting companies directly or indirectly. A similar view expresses the researchers Gartner Group [19] concerning the activation e-sourcing activities and e-procurement in B2B electronic market platform using the Internet. This approach to SRM enables large enterprises, small and medium to exchange goods, services, and information in a more efficient and effective way than was previously possible. Even if the supplier relationship management is theoretically it has a broad coverage and is not in Daley?s opinion [20] fully installed as a competence in business management, but rather accepted and defined as a formal discipline after Evans [21]. As a result of inadequate definition in SRM organizations it has little impact. It is in an identity crisis and has reduced its functions in integrated enterprise activities. Given the current limited objectives, particularly the cost of operating and risk management, says Vliet [22], SRM does not always appear as a source of competitive advantage. His study shows first frequency signal that this happens in organizations whose managers focus exclusively on supply problems, with low important component in increasing the effectiveness of relationship management. Secondly, some companies always pay attention to what managers are doing to strengths the links with suppliers recognizing the significance of relative size is important in creating value for the benefit of both parties.
C. Trust
The success depends on reliability and commitment of each partner in achieving strategies. Thus, SRM requests the acquisition and implementation of skills, values and behaviors aligned without distinction between providers. Usually, Mettler and Rohner [23] argue that the relationship with the suppliers concerns directly the development of the product or service. Taking into account these arguments as valid, Gecker [24] consider the beginning of the relationship as a strategic sourcing initiative and Emiliani [25] aware that this subsequently evolves in data and performance indicators. Adapting to the changing demands of end users is possible, as claimed by Lintukangas [26], the proximity of suppliers to increase trust and deepening cooperation and interaction.
Given these above three components, the company may adopt and implement a management system of providers to meet needs and to establish requirements in a fair. It may also standardizing the nomenclature of products, as suggested by Poirier [27]. This way no confusion or misunderstanding may occur regarding the delivery of goods or services.
III. BEHAVIOUR-COMMITMENTS IN SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS
A. Behaviour
Different behavior of economic agents and consumers are influenced by the needs and possibilities of access to resources. In their efforts to have a certain influence, the economic actors are in different relationships, but in Pound?s opinion [28], without always having a systematic and successful way. Therefore, as Moldovan [29] says, a relationship is convenient while it works fine. That is, for as long as the work and effort are appreciated and the desires and needs are taken into account. Achieving and maintaining connections in B2B relationships are the result of the efforts of partners. Strengthening of relationship gives safety to the parties while confidence expresses and devotion records. Thus supplier knows that he will have support if problems arise. However in a combination of type SRM it may occur elements that do not go well, that may vitiate the relationship, destabilize even hopelessly compromise it. It may appear different points of view (even if the ideas seem to be converging) state of decline, demotivation. Overcoming or elimination of problems in organizations can be done by using analytical models and influence behavior. Patterson, Grenny, Maxfield and McMillan [30], propose the use of the ?six sources of influence? model through which the company can identify measurable results, vital behavior and motivations and skills ?figure 2 ?.

Establishing the organization?s mission by using this model will inevitably change the attitude. Delimitation of of the relationship and clearly state of rules then you have to work with it will remove any assumptions that the partner would know instinctively to adapt the situations. Knowing the parameters of the relationship, perception of partner changes. Provider is given trust and hope in addressing seriously the obligations assumed. Therefore, understanding compliance requirements increase safety and reliability. Being a long process, building and confidence building is addressed especially to men. Abosag, Tynan and Lewis [31] argue that individuals? emotional involvement further reflects on economic relations Therefore, curdling trust claims politeness, friendship, empathy, similarity, honestly.
B. Commitement
Studying organizational behavior, especially in personal ?organization relationship, enabled the emergence of the concept of commitment in the early 1950s. After Abrahamsson [32], the evolution and development of the concept of commitment as presented in today literature, is based on several investigations, claims and disputes between researchers. Many definitions of commitment and measurement methods have been integrated in different models, the most commonly used model of organizational commitment has three components ? affective commitment, normative commitment and continuous commitment as proposed by Meyer and Allen [33].
By adopting commitment by the supplier, according to Abosag, Tynan, Lewis Dwyer [31], it is outlined the long-term benefits: quality products with lower cost information flow improved. The concept of Schurr and Oh [34], the implicit or explicit promise to continue the relationship is supported by Somogyi and Gyau [35], but it is envisaged the faith of partners for any short-term sacrifices to maintain the stability and efficiency as assessed Gyau and Spiller [36].
Representing the amount engages different entities to work together for a common goal, commitment is central to economic relations between partners. In Vogele?s opinion [37], commitment is the force that drives the relationship forward thus it is equated with growth or profitability. Studying manifestation commitment partners Corner and Patterson [38] Corner [39], notifies the occurrence of all kinds of tensions, resistances, and barriers that make it difficult to maintain it because the parties are unable to see the scale from the beginning their actions. The proposed model identifies three major phases of involvement in change, each assuming the completion of several steps ?fig. 3?.

IV. SEGMENTATION OF SUPPLIERS. PARTNERSHIP
To become more competitive companies must face global competition may otherwise risk leaving the business.
Following the achieving of additional values larger companies can make mistakes in choosing suppliers.
Hence the need to identify key suppliers. Degree of cooperation from the perspective of Billingt, Cordon, Volmanit [40], can provide a segmentation of suppliers in a mix of four levels ?fig. 4? on low, common to one very high of super-collaboration.

Trying to determine the depth of the relationship between partners in a business, Lambert [41], proposes a segmentation of collaborations with suppliers through a process with four components as follows: close, partnership, association, vertical integration ?fig. 5?

Lambert, Knemeyer, Gardner [42], confirm that the common law definition of partnership as a business relationship based on mutual trust, openness, sharing risks and rewards arising in business. Therefore, the partnership provides high performance of companies involved, more than would be achieved if they work separately.
Creating and implementing a partnership is a great challenge for managers who know that not all providers may be considered partners. Therefore their interest goes to those companies which will be a true partner. Implementing, developing and improving relations with suppliers can be based on a partnership model involving assessment, formulation, consultation, implementation, negotiation.
Any partnership model contains three types of partnership, says Lambert [41] by making the following specification:
? Type I ? with the wider use and with recognition as partners. Short-term approach.
? Type II ? does not emphasize coordination of activities but more on their integration in a longer time horizon.
? Type III which requires a high level of operational integration.
The enshrined partnership model in Lambert?s conception consists of three elements: ?engine? (Drivers), ?catalyst? (Facilitators), and ?components? (Components), ?fig. 6?.

The three elements lead to an expected result of parties: operational integration.
a) Driver elements are established after careful examination of potential parties counting on their belief in significant benefits by: (1) cost efficiency, (2) improve customer service, (3) marketing advantage and (4) before stability / growth.
and develop partnership providing a basis for good relations while establishing materiality chance. Facilitators include: (1) corporate compatibility, (2) similar managerial philosophy and techniques, (3) reciprocity and (4) symmetry.
c) Component elements are mostly similar set of managerial actions and events that determines and dominates the life of the partnership. Components are operational relationship through: planning, control, communication, sharing of risks and rewards sharing etc.
Sharing of above elements leads to a result that implies an assessment, perhaps a readjustment. Feedback requires regular updating of state drivers, facilitators and components. Own processes and performance measurement provider enables companies to fully inform the partner, not only about the lowest price
V. CONCLUSIONS
The message of this study reinforces the idea that enterprise economy is more advantageous if it is placed increased emphasis on relations with suppliers. As a relatively young discipline, supplier relationship management has no strong response in practice, not being widely adopted in business. Dealing primarily with segmentation suppliers, establishing performance measurement tools and being currently limited to a series of e-processes, SRM is easily confused with a component of acquisition chain (SCM). Therefore, in the forthcoming period, SRM will remain stuck especially in the area of electronic research of the best prices and markets as well as e-procurement, due to increasing interest shown by organizations for the installation of custom electronic systems for tracking processes. Therefore it is for the managers to reconsider SRM and ensure strengthening current practices, especially regarding the relationships of the organization change attitudes, to transfer information on process outsourcing, procurement, contract tracking, etc. SRM adoption by organizations is part of a new management philosophy to increase the commitment and ability of suppliers, to maintain a successful relationship with them.
REFERENCES
Campelo Eul?lio G. F. and Stucky W. ?The Supplier Relationship Management Market Trends? in Proceedings of European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2007, (EMCIS2007), June 24-26 2007, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain, pp 53-67, , http://www.iseing.org/emcis/emcis2007/emcis07cd/emcis07-pdfs/745.pdf, download 05.11.2012
[2] Sethi Sachin, ?Enhancing Supplier Relationship Management Using SAP SRM?, SAP PRESS 720 S., Auflage, 2010, http://www.sap-press.de/katalog/buecher/ htmlleseproben /gp/htmlprobID-108?GalileoSession=63827428A5ZHm8-lJ-g download 26.01.2012.
[3] Burnet Ken, ?Supplier Relationships in Businessbriefing: Global Purchasing & Supply Chain Strategies?, 2004, http://www.touchbriefings.com/pdf/199/ifpm032_p_ burnett.pdf , download 10.02.2012.
[4] Donoghue Joseph, ?Creating and Maintaining a Successful Supplier Relationship?, San Diego, CA 2011. http://leardon.com/successful-supplier-management, , download 25.01.2012.
[5] Ravi R., Menzigian K, (2003), ?Supplier Relationship Management: Moving From Counterparties to Collaboration?, An IDC Executive Brief January 2003, www.sccori.com SCM/scm.pdf, download 25.01.2012
[6] Alan Day, ?6 steps to better SRM?, Supply Management, Redactive Media Group, London, 2009, http://www.supplymanagement.com/analysis/features/2009/6-steps-to-better-srm/, download ?n 6.11.2012
[7] Itiliti, ?Applying the Principles of Supplier Relationship Management to Human Capital? 4/26/200, 2001, http://www.opentechnologies.com/writings/itiliti White Paper.pdf, download ?n 2.10.2012.
[8] Wikipedia, ?Supplier Relationship Management?, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supplier_relationship_management, download 06.11.2012
[9] Campelo Eul?lio Gomes. Analysis of Current Supplier Relationship Management Practices: A Solution Proposal, Dissertation, Universit?t Karlsruhe, 2009, pp 1-234, http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/documents/926128, download 10.02.2012,
[10] Bokhorst G., Frensch C, Giling N, Kolk, ?Supplier Relationship Management Solutions: Expected Value?, Capgemini Consulting Mario Place Utrecht in SRM Research 2006-2007: Solution Analyses, 2006, www.capgemini.com/consulting download ?n 25.01.2012, 60p.
[11] Hughes Jonathan, ?What is Supplier Relationship Management and Why Does it Matter??, Wiley, Inc 2010, http://www.vantagepartners.com/ISM_DILF_What_is_SRM.aspx , download 6.11.2012
[12] Hald Kim, Cord?n Carlos, Vollmann Thomas, ?Towards an understanding of attraction in buyer-supplier relationships?, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 38, Issue 8, pp. 960 ? 970, 2009, download 25.01.2012
[13] IDC Executive Brief, ?Supplier Relationship Management: Moving From ?Counterparties? to Collaboration?, 2006, http://www.sccori.com/SCM/scm.pdf, download ?n 04.10.2012,
[14] Larson Chris, ?A Just-In-Time Supply Chain??, in UPS Supply Chain Solutions, 2005, http://pressroom.ups.com/pressroom/staticfiles/pdf/whitepaper/wp_just-in-time_ supply_chain.pdf, acesat ?n 26.01.2012
[15] Guerra Joy Andrews and Cianchette Carrie, ?Just-in-Time Information?, in Avenue A Razorfish, Seatle WA, 2006, http://slant.avenuea-razorfish.com/1206 slant/jit.pdf, acesat in 26.10.2012
[16] Wienclaw Ruth, ?B2B Business Models?, EBSCO Publishing Inc 2008
[17] Wise, R. & Morrison, ?Beyond the exchange: The future of B2B?, Harvard Business Review, 78(6), 86-96. 2007, retrived from EBSCO Online Database Business Source Complete.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3712730&site=bsi-live
[18] Barry L., Senthil G., Pradip K, ?Best Practice: Supplier Stratification in Managing in an Uncertain Economy ?, Council for Research on Distributor Best Practices (CRDBP), 2010, created by the NAW Institute for Distribution Excellence and the Supply Chain Systems Laboratory at Texas A&M University nawinstitute.blogspot.com/?/best-practice-s
[19] Gartner group: B2B Buy-Side E-Procurement (Application Components) Internet Commerce. Gartner Research, 2004. www.gartner.com/id=307274 download in 28.01.2012
[20] Daley Andrew, The growing importance of Supplier Relationship Management Edbury Daley Ltd, Carrington Business Park, Carrington, Manchester, 2009, http://www.edburydaley.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/EdburyDaley-SRM-jan-2010.pdf
[21] Evans Rima, ?When do we get to SRM??, CPO Agenda (2010), http://www.cpoagenda.com/previous-articles/autumn-2010/features/when-do-we-get-to-srm/, download 7 oct. 2012
[22] Vliet M.Van, ?Supplier Relationship Management Soluctions: Expected Value?, Capgemini Consulting, September, 2006 download in 02.10.2012
[23] Mettler Tobias and Rohner Peter, ?Supplier Relationship Management: A Case Study in the Context of Health Care?, in Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, ISSN 0718?1876, Electronic Version Universidad de Talca ? Chile, Vol 4, December 2009 / 58-71, download 30.01.2012
[24] Gecker Rachel, Supplier Relationship Management, Corporate Meetings Incentives, 2008, http://meetingsnet.com/corporatemeetingsincentives/mag/relationship_management_1 008/index1.html, download in 22.12.2011
[25] Emiliani M.L, ?Historical lessons in purchasing and supplier relationship management?, in Journal of Management History, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Vol. 16 No. 1, 2010, 21p. http://www.bobemiliani.com/papers/purch_history.pdf, download 21.01.2012
[26] Lintukangas Katrina, ?Theoretical frames for studying supplier relationship management in global purchasing?, Lappeenranta University of Technology, School of Business, 2007, http://www.ifpsm.org/sites/default/files/4-theoretical-frames.pdf download ?n 25.01.2012
[27] Poirier C.Charles, ?Supplier Relationship Management: An Advanced Supply Chain Management Technique CSC Experiences. Results?. 2003, http:// www. Ascinstitute .com/library/whitepapers/SRM An Advanced SCM Technique.pdf, download ?n 12.12.2011, 13p.
[28] Pound Richard, Influencer ? The Power to Change Anything, VitalSmarts, 2008, www. influencerbook. com, http://www.imex-frankfurt.com/documents/Influencer_Richard_Pound.pdf, 5p.
[29] Moldovan Gabriel, ?Relationship management?, Rrbium hr, 2006, www.rrvbium.ro, http://asociatia-spp.ro/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Managementul-relatiilor.pdf, download ?n 2.10.2012,
[30] Patterson Kerry, Grenny Joseph, Maxfield David and McMillan Ron, Influencer: The Power to Change Anything, 2007, Publisher: McGraw-Hill; 1 edition ISBN-10: 007148499X, 288 p
[31] Abosag Ibrahim, Caroline Tynan, Christopher Lewis, ?The Commitment-Trust Theory: The British and Saudi Arabian, Cross-National Perspective?, IMP Group, 2006. http://www.impgroup.org/uploads/papers/5601.pdf, download in 12.10.2012.
[32] Abrahamsson Pekka, (2002), The Role of Commitment in Software Process Improvement, Academic Dissertation, Faculty of Science, University of Oulu, Linnanmaa, http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514267303/html/index.html, download ?n 12.10.2012
[33] Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. 1991. A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 1: 61- 89, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/105348229190011Z, download 01.10.2012
[34] Dwyer Robert, Schurr Paul, Oh Sejo,. Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 1987, http://www.cob.unt.edu/slides/SwartzS/MKTG/Spring/Articles/BuyerSeller/Relationships/dwyer_Schurr_Oh_JM/Developing_buyer_seller_relationships.pdf, download ?n 12.10.2012
[35] Somogyi Simon, Gyau Amos, The impact of price satisfaction on supplier commitment in the Australian wine supply chain, 2010, http://anzmac2010.org/proceedings/pdf/ANZMAC10Final00277.pdf, download 8.10.2012.
[36] Gyau, A., Spiller, A., The impact of supply chain governance structures on the interfirm relationship performance in agribusiness, Agricultural Economics, 54(4), 2008. http://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/01480.pdf, aceesat 12.10.2012.
[37] Voge Wilf, Stakeholder Commitment: Why Is It Important?, ExecutiveBrief, 2009, http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/stakeholder-commitment-why-is-it-important.html, download ?n 12.10.2012.
[38] Conner Daryl and Patterson Robert, (1982), Building Commitment to Organizational Change,. Training and Development Journal, v36 n4.
[39] Conner Daryl, (1998), Committing to change, in Managing at the Speed of Change; How resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail. John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-97494-3.
[40] Billington Corey, Cordon Carlos, Vollmann Tom, 2006, Super Supplier Collaboration, in Perspectives for managers, http://m.imd.ch/research/publications/upload/PFM134_LR_Billingt_Cordon_Volmanpdf.pdf, download ?n 12.10.2012,
[41] Lambert, Douglas M. (2008), Supply Chain Management: Processes, Partnerships, Performance, Sarasota, Florida: Supply Chain Management Institute, http://www.feg.unesp.br/~fmarins/log/materialparaleitura/Exec-Summary.pdf, download 12.10.2012.
[42] Lambert M. Douglas, Knemeyer A. Michael Gardner T John, (2004), Supply chain partnerships: Model validation and implementation, Journalof business logistics, Vol. 25, No. 2, http://www.eng.auth.gr/mattas/foodima/lamb7.pdf, download in 12.10.2012
[43] Unknow autor, The partnership model: a type of buyer-supplier relation. http://html.rincondelvago.com/the-partnership-model_a-type-of-buyer-supplier-relation.html , download 12.10.2012

Source: http://iacobvladut.finantare.ro/2012/12/23/theoretical-frameworks-on-supplier-relationship-management-in-enterprise-economy/

seahawks new uniforms 2012 tornadoes in dallas anchorman 2 kentucky basketball oaksterdam the fray national anthem dallas tornado

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Civil War Blog ? The Lincoln Flag Hoax

Posted By Norman Gasbarro on December 21, 2012

MVC-015S

Only one conclusion can be drawn from the analysis of the story of the Lincoln Flag of the Pike County Historical Society:? the flag is a hoax.? In today?s post, after summarizing the major events in the development of the Lincoln Flag story, a revelation will be made, that if true, will make moot all the deliberations, assumptions, suppositions and conclusions stated by the Pike County Historical Society as to the flag?s authenticity.? That revelation will be presented publicly for the first time here ? that this flag was purchased from an antique dealer in Chester County, Pennsylvania, by a member of the Gourlay-Struthers family in the early 1920s.? An analysis of the credibility of the story told by the person who came forward with the information will be included in this blog post.

In prior posts on this blog, it was shown Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers, who was a member of the cast of Our American Cousin the night of 14 April 1865 at Ford?s Theatre when Lincoln was assassinated, refrained from publicly speaking about events that took place at the theatre until after her husband, Robert Struthers, died in 1907.? In 1910, Jeannie visited Ford?s Theatre for the first time since the assassination, and in 1914, she was the subject of a story written by author-film-producer Norman Harsell.? That story gave roles to Jeannie?s father, Thomas C. Gourlay and two of Jeannie?s brothers, and in addition, placed Jeannie in the path of John Wilkes Booth as he fled through the backstage area of the theatre to his waiting horse which was outside the backstage door.? Harsell claimed that Jeannie?s father then led Laura Keene, the star of the performance, to the State Box by a back passage where she cradled the dying president in her lap, after which, the elder Gourlay then helped carry Lincoln across the street to the Petersen House where he died.? The Harsell version was very likely invented as the basis of a silent film which was to be released on the 50th anniversary of the assassination in 1915, but for whatever reason, the film was never made.? [Note:? see Jeannie Gourlay and Norman Harsell - The Film That Never Was].

In the Harsell version, nothing was mentioned about an American flag.? In the years between the publication of the 1914 story ? in all the published reports of and about Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers until her death in 1928 ? and the years between 1928 and 1954 when very little (if anything) was publicly stated about the role of the Gourlay family at the assassination, no references have be found which mention a flag.

In 1954, Vivian Paul Struthers, the son of Jeannie Gourlay, appeared at a meeting of the Pike County Historical Society to donate a 36-star flag, which he claimed was used by his grandfather, Thomas C. Gourlay, to cover Lincoln as he was carried across the street to the Petersen House from the theatre.? The only written documentation provided by Vivian Struthers to indicate that the flag was ?authentic? was a letter from the local high school principal which claimed that the 36-star flag was the official flag in April 1865 [Note: He was incorrect, in that the 36-star flag was not supposed to be "official" until 4 July 1865; however, purists will argue that after Lincoln's death, the 36-star flag was used and accepted as "official" during the period of mourning].

In the ensuing years since 1954, various curators and amateur historians at the Pike County Historical Society struggled with the story of this so-called Lincoln Flag that had supposedly covered Lincoln, and by the 1980s, a new version had evolved ? one which was based on the brownish-red stains on the flag that were believed to be blood.? Since Lincoln had only one wound, and that was in the back of his head, the only way the stains could be his blood, would be if the flag had been folded and placed under his head as a pillow or cushion ? rather than placed on top of him as a cover.? Thus, the story presented by Vivian Struthers at the time of the flag donation was changed.? Further confusing the issue was a blood test that had been performed at a local hospital ? which concluded that stains from two places on the flag gave positive reactions for blood (though human blood was not mentioned in the laboratory report).

Then in 1982, Edward Steers Jr., who at the time was President of the Lincoln Group of the District of Columbia (a ?chapter? of the ?Lincoln Fraternity?), arrived at the Pike County Historical Society and convinced the curator, George Perry, to give him several pieces of the flag so that he could perform his own tests.? Later, in two letters to the Society, Steers indicated that the red dye used on the flag was ?cochineal? (derived from crushing the bodies of cochineal beetles), that this natural dye was common to the period of the Civil War (synthetic dyes were used later), and that all this ?new-found? information would be the subject of an article on the flag and the assassination.? That article, written by Steers, contained numerous errors, including the misreporting of the test that Steers himself had performed (without indicating that he was the one who had performed the test), and the indication that he [Steers] had seen a report at the Society that the stains on the flag were human blood.? As a scientist, Steers knew, or should have known, that what he was reporting was not accurate.? He also should have known that cochineal and blood are often confused in that they produce similar test results.? Steers has never explained whether he was testing for blood or for the red dye on the flag, what parts of the flag his samples were taken from, how many samples he was given, and whether all the samples were used in the testing.? [See:? "The Flag That Cradled the Dying President's Head"].

Steers article in the The Lincolnian, despite the significant number of errors and misrepresentations, became the basis of the report of another member of the ?Lincoln Fraternity,? Joseph Garrera, a New Jersey insurance agent and Lincoln memorabilia collector, who arrived at the Society in 1995. With no academic credentials and only the promise to conduct a ?scholarly? study to determine the authenticity of the flag and consult with ?experts? and ?scholars? who he claimed to know personally, Garrera was given access to the?Society artifacts and files.? That study, which was concluded in 1996, declared the flag to be ?authentic?.? Garrera first presented his findings to fifteen Lincoln ?scholars,? including Frank J. Williams, Edward Steers Jr., Richard Sloan, Wayne Temple, Michael Maione, and Harold Holzer, all of whom concurred that Garrera had ?authenticated? the flag and praised him for his ?scholarly? endeavor.

FlagDinnerPhoto-004

Michael Maione, Frank J. Williams, unidentified guest, and Joseph Garrera at the 1996 Annual Meeting of the Pike County Historical Society

Trumpeting the ?authentication? report, the Pike County Historical Society invited Garrera, the news media and the fifteen Lincoln ?scholars? to its Annual Meeting in 1996, which was held in the ballroom of the Best Western Hotel in Westfall Township, Pike County.? Also attending the meeting were Civil War re-enactors, Lincoln impersonators, Lincoln memorabilia collectors and about 250 members of the public.?? Speakers at the Annual Meeting included Richard Sloan, who gave a prelude-presentation on Jeannie Gourlay and William Withers Jr.; Frank J. Williams, who told jokes about Lincoln and stories of how school children have perceived Lincoln; Michael Maione, who spoke of ?following the money? in analyzing Booth?s pre-assassination activities; and Joseph Garrera himself who was billed as the featured speaker.? During the course of the evening, music from the film Gettysburg blared over the loudspeakers (to get the audience in the mood) and a large display of Lincoln memorabilia from Garrera?s collection was on hand for attendees to view and admire.? The spectacle was professionally recorded by the Society ? and the conclusions of Garrera were reported internationally by CNN, the BBC, and the New York Times.

The first major challenge to the 1996 authentication report came in early 2000 when a newly hired, professional director at the?Society began to question some of the assumptions that Garrera had made as well as some of the misrepresentations that he [the director] was expected to present to the public about the flag.? After obtaining a copy of Garrera?s 1996 report (no copy was available at the Society), a complete analysis was done on what Garrera had presented and a scathing criticism was written and disseminated in a news conference that took place in April 2000 ? at which it was stated, that under the authority to interpret artifacts which was given to him [the director] by his contract, the Lincoln Flag would hereafter be interpreted as a legend.? The 1996 report was therefore considered as bogus.

000413-PR-LincolnsBloodOrStain-001a

Some of the member of the trustees of the Society said that the director?s criticisms of the 1996 report needed to have an ?in house? examination while others moved to mobilize members of the ?Lincoln Fraternity? to support the Garrera report.? In the end, the latter group won out and the director was suspended, pending a hearing on whether he had violated his contract by challenging the flag report and refusing to accede to the wishes of the individual trustees who insisted they had the right to force him to interpret the flag as ?authentic.?? The issue of ?museum ethics? was introduced by the director, who stated that it was unethical for a museum to lie about its artifacts.

000614-PR-MuseumHeadBashed-001a

The hearing, which took place in June 2000, was held in closed session despite the wishes of the director to have the press and public admitted.? The trustees called upon the local police force to prevent any unauthorized persons from entering.? After the so-called hearing, the Pocono Record reported that the director was ?bashed? by those trustees who were present, that he was not permitted to speak to defend himself, and that the trustees had pre-determined that they were going to fire him, although the actual firing took place at a later meeting.

The regional news media was very sympathetic to the director (Times Herald Record of Middletown, New York and the Pocono Record, of Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania) while the local media (Pike County Dispatch and Pike County Courier) was sympathetic to the museum trustees.

Then, the ?Lincoln Fraternity? came out in full force.? An article appearing in the News Eagle (Hawley, Pennsylvania), 17 June 2000, ?Historical Society Defends Lincoln Flag,? quoted Harold Holzer, Vice President of the Metropolitan Museum of Art,? as defending Garrera?s 1996 authentication report by stating:

The historical importance of the Lincoln Flag cannot be overstated.? It should not be treated as a piece of folklore, but as a relic of America?s most tragic night.

That article also cited Frank J. Williams, a Justice of the Rhode Island Superior Court, and Chairman of the Lincoln Forum, and Michael Maione, Historian of Ford?s Theatre, as fully supporting the authentication.

Another article, which appeared in the Pike County Dispatch, 22 June 2000, said that five Lincoln scholars strongly supported Garerra and his insistence that the flag was authentic.? Garrera claimed to have received recent letters from each of them re-affirming their support.? Those five scholars were then identified as Richard Sloan, who was said to be ?the nation?s leading expert on Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers;? Wayne Temple, Chief Director of the Illinois State Archives; Dr. Edward Steers Jr., author of four books on the Lincoln assassination, and ?one of the nation?s leading experts on the assassination;? Harold Holzer; and Justice Frank J. Williams.

The Pocono Record reported the final settlement in an article which appeared on 11 January 2001, ?Museum Flap Settled in Pike.?? The director had been fired because he dared to question the Lincoln ?scholars? and the conclusion of the trustees was that the flag was ?authentic? to the assassination, that the flag contained blood stains from Lincoln?s wound, and that the authentication report was sound and accurate.

In the intervening days between the first article that appeared in April 2000 that questioned Garrera?s authentication report of 1996 and the director?s final settlement of January 2001, the news was primarily a regional story, with occasional reporting outside the Pocono-Catskill mountain region where the Society is located. But at least one of the reports made its way to another part of Pennsylvania ? and that report caught the attention of an antique dealer in Chester County, Pennsylvania.

In September 2000, in a phone conversation with the owner of Sadsbury House Antiques in Sadsburyville, Chester County, Pennsylvania, the true origin of the Lincoln Flag was revealed.?? John Robinson, a retired Commander of the U.S. Navy, and owner-operator of Sadsbury House Antiques, said that he was closing down the family business in Sadsburyville, when he heard about the controversy regarding the Lincoln Flag, and he didn?t believe that the director should be fired for challenging the erroneous assumption that this flag had been placed under Lincoln?s head at the assassination.? Robinson claimed that his great aunt, Meda Randall, who had founded the antique business in 1920, had sold the ?large American flag with 36-stars? to ?a woman from Pennsylvania? in the early 1920s.? He indicated that he had attempted to make contact earlier, but could not get a message through to authorities at the Pike County Historical Society.? He [Robinson] came forward because harm had come to an individual?s career because he [the director] had challenged the false information that was being presented by the Society ? information that Robinson and members of his family (and business) knew to be false.? He did not want to be considered an accessory to this conduct and wished to set the record straight, and testify, if need be on behalf of the director. [Note:? Several attempts were made to get this information to officials at the Society, but they were unwilling to accept anything from anyone other than Lincoln "scholars" who they said were strongly supporting the authentication and the 1996 report.? After the settlement with the director in January 2001, the issue was considered "closed" by written agreement of both parties].

Meda [Williams] Randall (1876-1978)

The analysis of the information provided by John Robinson has taken several years and has been facilitated by information subsequently published on the web about the Lincoln Highway, Meda Randall?s dealings with Henry duPont and Henry Ford, Ancestry.com records and family trees.? Nearly everything stated by John Robinson in the September 2000 phone conversation has now been validated by evidence ? both circumstantial and actual.? Unfortunately, because John Robinson was closing down the family business which had existed since 1920, he had discarded many of the early records ? including the file on the Lincoln Flag ? and thus had to rely on his memory, which in the case of the flag was relatively recent in that the files had only been discarded within the year (just before 2000) ? before the firing of the director was publicized.? Had he known earlier, he said would have kept those records.

The story of Meda Randall as an antique dealer and how it intersects with Jeannie Gourlay can now be told with the supportive documentation.

Meda Mary Williams, the great aunt of John Robinson, was born in 1876 in Atglen, Chester County, Pennsylvania.? Early-on, she and members of her family were involved in the junk business in and around Atglen.? Meda married Capt. Albert W. Randall, an officer in the U.S. army who first served in the Spanish-American War, and then in World War I as part of the American Expeditionary Force (AEF) under Gen. John Pershing.

Capt. Albert Waldo Randall (1870-1961)

Commander John Robinson explained that at the end of World War I, Capt. Albert W. Randall was assigned to the ?Hoover Commission? where he served in Europe assisting in the relief efforts for the displaced civilian population.? The ?Hoover Commission,? named for Herbert Hoover who later became president, was sometimes called the ?Hoover Food Administration? and operated out of London and Paris in the months after the war.? It consisted of about 350 American officers asked to stay behind by Gen. Pershing to manage the supply and distribution system that provided food and other forms of relief to civilians.? In checking the information provided by Commander Robinson, several contemporary news articles were found that supported the fact that these officers were kept in France after the main part of the AEF returned home.

In addition, the passport application of Meda [Williams] Randall was located through Ancestry.com, in which she and several officials of the U.S. government supported her application to go to Europe to join her husband.? The passport application of Meda [Williams] Randall contains many papers relating to the workings of the Hoover Food Administration and Capt. Albert W. Randall?s work with it in Paris, France, and London, England as part of the residual group of officers of the American Expeditionary Force that were left behind to manage relief efforts for the European population.

The portions of the passport application containing Meda?s personal data and her reasons for traveling to Europe (?Hoover Food Administration?) are shown above.? Below, is a portion of the ship list from the Lafayette:

Click on document to enlarge.

The Randall?s returned to the United States in December 1919 on board the Lafayette, sailing from LeHavre, France, on 6 December and arriving on 18 December in New York City.? Capt. Randall then received his discharge from the army with special thanks from the government for his humanitarian service as part of the Hoover Food Administration.

In the discussion with John Robinson, two possible scenarios emerged as to the origins of the large 36-star flag that was eventually sold to ?a woman from Pennsylvania.?? In the first scenario, Capt. Randall was presented with a gift from the government ? a large, 36-star American flag that had been on public display in Washington, D.C. during the mourning period for Lincoln ? a ?Lincoln Flag? that, appropriately could be a centerpiece in the antique shop that his wife would establish early that year on the Lincoln Highway in Sadsburyville, Chester County, Pennsylvania.? The second scenario had Meda [Williams] Randall purchasing the flag from Custis family descendants, while she was in the process of acquiring antiques for two of her major customers, Henry Ford of Dearborn, Michigan, and Henry DuPont, of Pennsylvania and Delaware.? Because John Robinson was not yet born when his great aunt and great uncle established the antique business in 1920 in Chester County, he had to rely on family stories and receipts and correspondence left by his aunt at the business (the Lincoln Flag file) in order to reconstruct the story of the origin of the flag.? Meda Randall did not die until 1978, more than ten years after John Robinson began working in the antique business with her.? Commander Robinson strongly believed that the flag that was on display at the Pike County Historical Society was the same flag that his great aunt had sold to Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers and/or her daughter Jean [Struthers] Newell.? Again, his reason for not reporting all this sooner was that up until April 2000, no apparent harm had come to anyone by the false misrepresentation of the flag as being present at the Lincoln assassination ? but once harm had come to someone for challenging that story ? the harm being the actual firing of the director -? he [Robinson] felt duty-bound to report that the flag story told by the Pike County Historical Society was a hoax and that its true ?origin? was through his family?s antique business and that the flag was never present at the Lincoln assassination.

John Robinson said that he believed the flag was authentic to the period after the Civil War in that it was one that was supposedly used during the Lincoln mourning period which occurred for a time after the assassination. The 36-star flag, being ?official? for a two-year period from 4 July 1865 to 4 July 1867 when Nebraska was admitted as the 37th state, could have been flown over a public building or have been displayed on the face of a large building during this time.? Again, from his knowledge of the flag?s origin, he [Robinson] was positive that this flag had nothing to do with Ford?s Theatre or the Lincoln Assassination.

Sadsbury House ? Founded in 1920

In addition to naming her major clients, John Robinson also indicated that his great aunt was the first woman to be the sole proprietor of an antique dealership in Pennsylvania.? A story about Meda [Williams] Randall was said to appear in a Lancaster County newspaper, telling of her antique business, her major clients, and her knowledge and sources of authentic American antiques.

The picture of the business sign (above) is cropped from one of the pictures in a book by Brian Butko, who is considered to be the historian of the Lincoln Highway.? The picture was accompanied by the following text:

Meda Randall opened the Sadsbury House in 1920.? Her niece Mary Stock joined the business in 1945, and when she retired in 1977, she turned it over to nephew John Robinson.? He?s actually been part of the business since 1968, after years in the Navy and as a computer research executive.? Look for the sign of the lion for a mix of antiques and ?stuff.?

Winterthur

Henry Francis duPont (1880-1969), according to John Robinson, was one of Meda Randall?s major customers.? Winterthur was the name of his estate, which is located in northern Delaware, in relative close proximity to Philadelphia and Chester County, Pennsylvania, where Meda Randall had her antique dealership.? The entry in Wikipedia for Henry Francis duPont states the following:

Initially a collector of European art and decorative arts in the late 1920s, H. F. du Pont became interested in American art and antiques. Subsequently, he became a highly prominent collector of American decorative arts, building on the Winterthur estate to house his collection, conservation laboratories, and administrative offices.

The museum has 175 period-room displays and approximately 85,000 objects. Most rooms are open to the public on small, guided tours. The collection spans more than two centuries of American decorative arts, notably from 1640 to 1860, and contains some of the most important pieces of American furniture and fine art. The Winterthur Library includes more than 87,000 volumes and approximately 500,000 manuscripts and images, mostly related to American history, decorative arts, and architecture. The facility also houses extensive conservation, research, and education facilities.

Articles which Meda [Williams] Randall procured for duPont which are now housed at Winterthur include:? antiques, furniture, beds, tables, woodwork, cellarettes, lighting fixtures, ironwork, andirons, chairs, glassware, settees, hangings, flowers, dogwood tress, garniture, hardware, brass, engravings, spreads, antiques, furniture, tinware, etui, boxes, hardware, glassware, textile fabrics, trim, spreads, rugs, ironwork, eagles, frames, banners, tableware, silverwork, books, Sheffield plate, pewter, clothing, cupboards, books, wallpaper, pewter, boxes,? marble, wallpaper, bookcases, hangings, flowers, brass, engravings, and spreads.? The correspondence and receipts related to these acquisitions and sales are kept at Winterthur Library in 66 archival boxes and have become part of the provenance and authentication of each of the items. The finding aid for these items is available at Antique Dealer Papers on the Winterthur Library website. The name ?Meda M. Randall? appears many times in the finding aid.? It is possible that somewhere in the archival boxes, a 36-star flag is described in one of the letters Meda Randall sent to duPont.

The Atglen, Chester County, railroad station (shown above) is no longer standing. It was located on the Main Line of the Pennsylvania Railroad and Amtrak Keystone trains pass by this spot daily on their way from Philadelphia to Harrisburg.? It was from this station that Meda Randall probably did her shipping.? Atglen is only a few miles from the Lincoln Highway (U.S. Route 30) where Sadsbury House Antiques was located.? The Randall?s lived on Green Street in Atglen, which intersects the railroad tracks in Atglen, and they appear with occupation as dealer/collector in the 1930 U. S. Census.

A 19 September 1936, Christian Science Monitor article, ?Antique Collectors of Nation Display Treasures at Detroit.?? Meda Randall is featured as a prominent, well-known dealer.

Henry Ford (1843-1867) was also a customer of Meda Randall.? The Henry Ford Museum is located in Dearborn, Michigan, and contains thousands of historical antiques, including the actual chair Abraham Lincoln was sitting on when he was assassinated at Ford?s Theatre.

Henry Ford (1863-1947)

Henry Ford began his search for objects of Americana in the early 1920s, at the same time that Meda Randall established her business in Pennsylvania.? When Henry Ford attempted to purchase the entire contents of the Oldroyd Lincoln Museum at the Petersen House in Washington, D.C., in 1923, Jeannie Gourlay supposedly wrote a letter to President Warren G. Harding indicating that she believed that the government should purchase the museum contents, not a private collector.? No doubt, at this time, Meda Randall had already connected with Henry Ford and was working to fill his collecting needs and was aware of Ford?s attempts to purchase the Oldroyd Collection.

In 1942, in response to the difficulties presented by gas rationing, Meda Randall began shipping her purchases to customers as stated in an 8 August 1942, Saturday Evening Post article, ?Roadside Business: Casualty of War.?? It was difficult for many customers to get to her shop, so she operated a ?mail order? business, sending items for ?approval? in the hopes of getting purchases.

In the early 1920s, Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers came to know Meda Randall.? While it is not certain how they first met, it could have been through Jeannie?s son-in-law, Charles W. Newell.? Media, Delaware County, Pennsylvania, was the home of Charles W. Newell, husband to Jeannie?s daughter, Jean [Struthers] Newell.? Charles W. Newell was a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and a civil engineer.? Following graduation, he went to work for the Pennsylvania Railroad and in 1920, was Superintendent of the Main Line of that railroad ? which included the Atglen Station and facilities in Chester County.? For Jean [Struthers] Newell and her mother Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers, it would have been an easy rail trip to Atglen and then to Sadsburyville to the antique business of Meda Randall.? Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers was interested in mementos of the Lincoln assassination ? a playbill with her name on it, a picture of John Wilkes Booth, and any other items that Meda Randall could provide.? On one of the trips to Sadsbury House, Meda Randall sold her the Lincoln Flag.

Thus, in the early 1920s, the Lincoln Flag came into the Gourlay-Struthers family.? On a return trip to Milford, Pike County, Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers took the flag with her and placed it in a chest or trunk in her house ? and then it was forgotten.? Jeannie?s health began to decline, she spent her remaining days with daughters Mabel [Struthers] Humbert in Montclair, New Jersey and Jean [Struthers] Newell in Media, Pennsylvania ? except for a time that she spent in the Forrest Home for Actors in Philadelphia.? But she was only there for a while.? Jeannie?s death occurred in 1928 at the Newell home in Media ? not very far from the place that she had purchased the Lincoln Flag.

Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers has not yet been located in a 1920 census, although many people assume that she was living in Milford, Pike County.? Jeannie?s son, Vivian Paul Struthers was living in Bloomfield, Essex County, New Jersey in 1920, and working in shipbuilding.? In 1930, after the death of his mother, Vivian was living in rented quarters in Matamoras, Pike County, Pennsylvania, and according to the census, was employed in ?odd jobs.?? The 1932 Pike County Directory is the earliest time in which he appears to be living in the Water Street house where Jeannie lived.? How much contact he had with his mother during the 1920s is unknown.? And, it is not clear who was living in the Water Street house in the 1920s, although the house remained in the family for many years after Jeannie?s death.

Vivian Paul Struthers presented the Lincoln Flag to the Pike County Historical Society in 1954, either with no knowledge that his mother had purchased it from Meda Randall or, if he had such knowledge, falsified the story that it had been used to cover Lincoln as he was moved across the street from Ford?s Theatre.? Surely though, Vivian?s sister, Jean [Struthers] Newell knew the truth, and was probably with her mother when the flag was purchased.? This could be the reason for Jean [Struthers] Newell?s coy and evasive responses when she was interviewed at the Society in the 1970s ? carefully parsing her words to avoid an outright lie ? and leaving hanging what she knew about the flag, thus allowing the Society to interpret it as it saw fit, without interference from her.

The story told by John Robinson has no apparent flaws.? It is certainly much more sound that anything presented by the Pike County Historical Society in relation to the Lincoln Flag.? The question then comes down to this:? who is to be believed?? who is more credible?? John Robinson, a retired naval commander, had no reason to present any false or enhanced information and at the time, had every reason to come forward with the truth.? Very little in the Pike County Historical Society version of the Lincoln Flag fits the available facts ? from the architecture of Ford?s Theatre to the chain of custody of the flag ? all seem to be created to fit the Norman Harsell story, which clearly didn?t happen that way at all.

If any blame is to be given for creating the Lincoln Flag hoax, it has to be first given to the Pike County Historical Society who didn?t take the necessary steps to properly document the original donation, who over the years distorted and inaccurately reported the actual evidence, who allowed amateurs who claimed to be experts to take part in the flag?s so-called authentication, and then when faced with a challenge to what was clearly a fabricated story, chose to fire the director who brought the errors into the light.

Will shame now be cast on a group self-appointed Lincoln ?scholars? who will do anything to protect their own ?Lincoln fraternity? brothers ? including supporting the firing of a museum director who challenged them?

It remains to be seen how this all settles out ? whether the Pike County Historical Society will re-visit ? in a professional manner ? the entire Lincoln Flag history ? or whether they will choose to ignore completely this now-public, alternate origin of the flag.

??????????

In tomorrow?s post, some of the resources used to study the life of Jeannie [Gourlay] Struthers and the Lincoln Flag will be presented as an annotated bibliography.
??????????

The portraits of Meda [Williams] Randall and Albert Waldo Randall are from their passport files which are available on Ancestry.com.

?????????-

A Personal Note:? I conducted the phone interview in September 2000 with John Robinson by calling him at his business after he finally got a message through to the director, Charles Clausen.? Notes from the phone interview formed the basis of the follow-up research, some of which is presented here in this post.? Prior to September 2000, I was the treasurer of the Pike County Historical Society, and as such had access to all the records pertaining to the Lincoln Flag.? I concurred with the report presented in April 2000 by Clausen, which challenged the 1996 report by Garrera that supposedly authenticated the flag.? I announced my resignation as the treasurer on the day that the director was suspended by the trustees and thus was no longer an official of the Society when I interviewed John Robinson.? My attempts to contact the Society were done through one of the officers who I thought would bring the information to the attention of the Society?s attorney who had refused to speak with me since I was no longer a member of the Board of Trustees of the Society.? I am not aware that the attorney was ever told of the information that I had received from John Robinson.? Both the attorney and the officer I spoke to are now deceased.? The last attempt I made to speak with the officer was at the dedication of the elevator-lift that made the first floor of the museum accessible.? In 2004, I moved from Pike County to Philadelphia, where I have resided since.? My interest in the Lincoln Flag was re-kindled after Edward Steers Jr. published his Lincoln Assassination Encyclopedia, which provided what I am convinced was false information about Jeannie Gourlay, Thomas C. Gourlay, Laura Keene, and the Lincoln Flag, and later by Steers? criticism of Bill O?Reilly?s book, Killing Lincoln.

?


Source: http://civilwar.gratzpa.org/2012/12/the-lincoln-flag-hoax/

sign of the times keystone pipeline purim acc tournament big ten tournament big east tournament 2012 solar storm